The good faith acts of directors of profit or non-profit corporations which are within the powers of the corporation and within the exercise of an honest business judgment are valid.  Rywalt v. Writer Corp, 526 P.2d 316, 317 (Colo. App. 1974).

It is educational to review the Rywalt case, above, to show the deference the courts will give to Board decisions. In this case, a group of homeowners sued the Association in an attempt to prevent the Association from entering into an agreement with the developer to build a second tennis court on the common area close to the plaintiffs’ homes. The cost of the tennis court would be borne by the developer. The plaintiffs argued, among other things, that the Association’s decision was arbitrary and capricious. Continue Reading Court Deference to Board Business Decisions

Summer time is the season of vacations, fun and, for many Community Associations, construction.  Most Managers are very thorough and knowledgeable, and have assisted Associations with construction projects. Some Board members have worked in the construction industry and have valuable insights. So why is it wise to involve an independent engineer, architect, or construction expert (here called "engineer") in your Association’s repair projects (such as painting, roofing, siding or asphalt projects)? Here are a few reasons for an engineer to be involved on repair or restoration projects in your community:Continue Reading CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS: IT MAKES SENSE TO HIRE AN EXPERT

Sometimes we want to pass on information that has nothing to do with community associations in particular, but which might be of interest to our readership in general. This is one of those times. This article was published in Life at Ken-Caryl, a bi-weekly publication of our friends at the Ken-Caryl Ranch Master Association,…

Winzenburg, Leff, Purvis & Payne is proud to announce that partner Mark K. Payne will be co-chairing and speaking at CLE International’s Community Association Law Seminar at the Grand Hyatt in Denver on June 11, 2007.

Mark will provide an in-depth analysis of the Fair Housing Act and its application to community associations. In an …

One thing about this business – it is full of surprises. One surprise that occasionally comes to light during our course of representing an association has to do with how common expenses are shared. The declaration of restrictive covenants (which imposes the obligation to pay assessments) should describe how expenses of the association are allocated. In fact, CCIOA mandates that the declaration must allocate the various types of allocated interests: the allocation of voting rights; the allocation of burden of common expenses; and in condominiums, the ownership of the undivided interests in the common elements. In a couple of cases recently we’ve discovered that an association is allocating common expenses in a manner that is different from how the declaration specifies.Continue Reading Assessments According to the Declaration – Who Cares?

A question we are frequently asked by associations is how strictly they should enforce their covenants. This was exactly the dilemma faced by a small patio home community located in North West Denver. Apparently a homeowner had painted her house golden yellow. The color was not unattractive – it actually looked quite nice – but it was clearly not one of the earth tone colors approved by the association. After some investigation by the Association’s Board of Directors, it became apparent that this was an honest mistake by the homeowner. She was new to the community and was unaware that she was restricted in her color choices. Although she was also willing to work with the Association to correct things, money was an issue. She had recently experienced some serious personal problems and could not afford to repaint her house. This is when I received a call from the Board’s president asking “What should we do?”Continue Reading Covenant Enforcement – The Golden Rule

Below is a trial story from Larry Leff, senior partner here at WLPP:

Not Your Ordinary Collection Case

In the not too distant past our firm took on a collection case for one of our associations that took an interesting twist. We filed a lawsuit in our county court, jurisdiction under $15,000.00, against a homeowner for the non-payment of assessments. The debtor homeowner filed a counterclaim against the Association, asserting claims that the association breached its contract with him – failing to maintain the property – and   that it breached its fiduciary duty to him, among other claims. He also requested exemplary damages. During the course of litigation, the homeowner brought his account current, minus the attorney fees and costs. At trial, the Association was granted an award for its attorney fees and costs, and the court dismissed all the homeowner’s counterclaims.

The homeowner refused to satisfy the judgment, so garnishment proceedings were initiated.   The garnishment was successful and the Association collected the full amount.

Subsequent to the satisfaction, the homeowner decided he wanted to do landscaping work to enhance his property. He put up a retaining wall of concrete, railroad ties, gravel and
Continue Reading Not Your Ordinary Collections Case

Do you or your manager ever receive calls from your members about a domestic violence problem between other residents in your community? How about speeding in the public streets? What about the wild party with all the noise and disturbance at 2:00 a.m.? WHAT ARE YOU GOING TO DO ABOUT IT?! Well, you’re the Association, after all; ENFORCE THE !@##$@@ COVENANTS!! TAKE CARE OF THE PROBLEM!!Continue Reading Why Call The Police When Your Association Can Handle the Problem?

Issue: A large homeowners association is looking to make repairs to the common area fences within the community. What options are available to them to finance this project?

Background: Recently, the Board of Directors of a large homeowners association called our office to discuss a problem. It seems that they had common area fences that were fairly old and in desperate need of some TLC. Unfortunately they did not have any funds available to make the necessary repairs.    Pursuant to the Association’s covenants, the Board was severely restricted in the amount it could set for the annual assessments each year (without approval of at least 2/3 of the members, the covenants limited the annual assessment to a 10% increase from the previous year). As a consequence, the Association’s reserve fund was nearly empty. The Board had tried on several occasions to get the members to approve a special assessment, but it was turned down each time. The Board was now wondering what options it had available to pursue.Continue Reading Financing Repairs to the Common Elements